Subsidy Management in Agriculture
![]() |
Application of granular fertilizer on seedlings |
Subsidy systems have been a mainstay of
development countries government's long-term policy of promoting social equity
and political stability. This policy attempts at sharing national natural
resource wealth (Akhter, et al., 2001)
Governments in most Developing Economies offer
social interventions through subsidy systems. It is estimated that Africa loses
the equivalent of $4 billion worth of soil nutrients annually, thereby
weakening its capacity to sustain plant life. Given the poor natural attributes
of the soils, coupled with poor management practices, there is consensus that
significant increase in inorganic fertilizer use is necessary to restore and
maintain their fertility in order to enhance productivity. (Minot & Benson, 2009)
To tackle the inefficiencies in the subsidy
distribution programmes, systems must be put in place to arrest the bottlenecks
such as fraud, diversion, etc.
In order to develop successful systems,
identifying user requirements is essential. These requirements have to be taken
into consideration carefully as design issues by application developers (Kruchten, 2004) . Meeting the
requirements for a subsidy distribution system involves achieving varying objectives
as technological, organizational and social objectives. In such enterprise
systems, emphasis should be placed on the importance of modelling the business
before eliciting its requirements (Al-Debei & Avison,
2010)
According to Safaricom CEO Bob
Collymore, “Mobile technology has the
ability to revolutionise traditional distribution models. This turn-key
solution will transform the operations of businesses across Kenya,”
With the introduction of an electronic voucher
system, registered farmers are able to purchase the subsidised inputs from
authorised retailers and distributors. The entire chain of a transaction can be
tracked electronically thereby reducing fraudulent purchases and making
reconciliation easier for stakeholders.
In India, the
government’s decision to change the contour of giving fertiliser subsidy to
companies on actual sales made to farmers through point of sale (PoS) devices
is aimed at streamlining the annual subsidy it gives to the sector. (Sally, 2018) . The system is also
aimed at preventing over-invoicing, plugging leakages, reduction in diversion,
ensure that supply chain losses will be the responsibility of the fertiliser
company, predict real-time demand and track actual utilisation by farmers. (Sally, 2018)
A careful consideration
of Checkland’s “soft
system methodology, a process
which allows a group of actors who are faced with a common problem to solve it
in a collective learning process” (Checkland, 1981) in the subsidy
distribution system will ensure that experiences and concerns of all actors in
the chain are considered by implementors before implementation. Thus, the design
of a human
activity system for collective action. The soft system is a
social construct and hence actors such as researchers, extension workers and
farmers cannot normally be considered as a system. They can be formed as a
system if they link together and contribute to the performance of the system. (Checkland & S, 1998)
It is the expectation of the Ministry of Food and Agriculture, Ghana that the present application rate of 12kg per hectare will increase to 20kg/ha projected in the Abuja declaration of fertilizer use by the African Green Revolution with the full implementation of the programme.
References
Akatey, N. K.,
2015. Government of Ghana. [Online]
Available at: http://ghana.gov.gh/index.php/media-center/features/1153-the-launch-of-the-agric-fertilizer-subsidy-programme-and-the-way-forward&gws_rd=cr&ei=WbWqWOOlKcS2abj-vYAL
[Accessed 9 June 2018].
Available at: http://ghana.gov.gh/index.php/media-center/features/1153-the-launch-of-the-agric-fertilizer-subsidy-programme-and-the-way-forward&gws_rd=cr&ei=WbWqWOOlKcS2abj-vYAL
[Accessed 9 June 2018].
Akhter, A. U., E, H. B. & Gutner, T. a. H. L.,
2001. The Egyptian food subsidy system: Structure, performance, and options
for reform. IFPRI Briefs, Volume 119.
Al-Debei, M. M. & Avison, D., 2010. Developing a
unified framework of the business model concept. European Journal of
Information Systems, 19(3).
Checkland, P., 1981. Systems Thinking, Systems
Practice. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
Checkland, P. & S, H., 1998. Information,
systems and information systems: making sense of the field. Chichester:
John Wiley and Sons.
Kruchten, P., 2004. The Rational Unified Process:
An Introduction. 3rd ed. s.l.:Addison-Wesley Professional.
Minot, N. W. & Benson, T., 2009. Fertilizer
subsidies in Africa: Are vouchers the answer?. International Food Policy
Research Institute (IFPRI), Issue briefs, January, Issue 60, p. 8.
Sally, M., 2018. The Economic Times- India. [Online]
Available at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/agriculture/need-to-improve-infrastructure-to-prevent-leakage-in-fertiliser-subsidy-study/articleshow/63944044.cms
[Accessed 10 June 2018].
Available at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/agriculture/need-to-improve-infrastructure-to-prevent-leakage-in-fertiliser-subsidy-study/articleshow/63944044.cms
[Accessed 10 June 2018].
Comments
Post a Comment